Closed born-in-brooklyn closed 6 years ago
Hi @born-in-brooklyn, sorry this took a while to address. I think this broke about a year ago in efc196c51c1c941e7fea6d442627561de56becb4, which was my fault for not having tests that would've caught it.
I reverted the code and wrote some tests to specify how -r
and-s
work, so you should be all set. (@dbut023, I assumed the intent of your change was to make the code clearer and not to change the functionality, but feel free to shoot me a message and we can work your change back in)
I also published a new gem that includes the fix
No worries for the delay! I'm glad you are continuing to support this. Right now my main goal is to use this to report coverage on a legacy project, so I don't want to analyze everything, just what has already been refactored. I will give it a try and get back to you. Thanks again!
Hi,
With the most recent release a technique that I used to use to filter out only certain procedures for running piggly seems to have gotten broken. I used to do something like this:
and it used to process only those procs. now it seems it only processes the first one. any ideas?