Closed wenjianmin closed 1 year ago
Thanks! The TreeNode
class shown in the document is a common and most-used version, while the TreeNode
in source code contains a more property height
for constructing AVL Tree.
I think it is not necessary to replace them with a link because the definition will be rarely modified.
However, it seems like the TreeNode
in the document is not correct. Could you fix it?
Q:Found that the binary tree chapter documentation is out of sync with the code presentation
Are you planning to replace the code fragment in md with [class]{xxx}-[func]{xxx}? I can contribute to the work!