Closed kernhanda closed 2 years ago
I created a small test for this PR (see attached). It confirms the PR fixes the stride calculation for the indices output.
Well spotted! Looking at the maxpool.h file now, and its pretty much gibberish now to me. I should have commented it better :|
@robinvanemden thanks for the test. I added it locally, and without @kernhanda 's patch, it indeed failed. With the patch it passed. So I merged this PR in.
However, now after merging this in, I'm re-trying the test, and it fails: in the generated test suite, both tensor_output_0
and tensor_reference_0
are of shape [3][223][223]
, where as the entry function expects output Y
to be of shape [1][3][223][223]
.
I'm not quite sure what is going on here, I'll have to have a closer look. It might be related to the recent commit a3a6b2a3176cad4f06a9115aa6144febb0826f9e that changes how (missing) batch sizes (i.e. the dimension are treated. For now, I added the contents of the zip to branch pr21 (8224d134e06fc812804db568beaa7aef6494b3e1).
I added regression tests for this fix in 90a97945e0aaa60da1dd5b98257a4161f0636379
Super, thank you!
The current implementation breaks for the attached ONNX model
MaxPool.zip