Closed theintz closed 10 years ago
The output of the apc_cache_info() function differs slightly from that of the original function. We are using the cache_list subarray to gather information about the cache behavior, which is currently broken.
APCu:
php > $t = apc_cache_info('user'); php > print_r($t); Array ( [cache_list] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [key] => abc [ttl] => 0 [nhits] => 0 [mtime] => 1382608917 [ctime] => 1382608917 [dtime] => 0 [atime] => 1382608917 [ref_count] => 0 [mem_size] => 656 ) ) )
APC:
php > $t_apc = apc_cache_info('user'); php > print_r($t_apc); Array ( [cache_list] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [info] => abc [ttl] => 0 [type] => user [num_hits] => 0 [mtime] => 1382608983 [creation_time] => 1382608983 [deletion_time] => 0 [access_time] => 1382608983 [ref_count] => 0 [mem_size] => 656 ) ) )
Sorry, just now saw https://github.com/krakjoe/apcu/pull/42. Has this already been fixed in that commit? Can we expect a new release soon?
Yes, it was fixed.
Yes soon ...
The output of the apc_cache_info() function differs slightly from that of the original function. We are using the cache_list subarray to gather information about the cache behavior, which is currently broken.
APCu:
APC: