Open azampagl opened 12 years ago
I'll have to look into this. The error you mention usually goes away when we add <property name="ti.android.threadstacksize" type="int">32768</property>
to tiapp.xml
, but that does not seem to be the case here.
Also, could you please try Ti SDK 1.7.3. I think Appcelerator made som changes in 1.7.5 which weren't meant to go live until 1.8, but still did. When 1.8 goes live, Kranium has to be slightly rebuilt since they've made their module sandboxing stricter.
Cheers
Unfortunately, I just nuked my dev box that had 1.7.3 :/. I'll report back with some results when I try adding the property tag to tiapp.xml. Thanks for your help!
I added the property tag on a 1.7.5 SDK build. It's "running", but getting weird errors on bootup and on the Backbone tab and jade tab:
I'd assume it's due to the "restricted sandboxing", as you referred it to.
Host: Mac OSX 10.7 Titanium: 1.7.5 SDK Android SDK: 2.3.3 (API 10, Rev 2.)
I'm also receiving an error on a 1.7.2 SDK build.
Host: Mac OSX 10.7 Titanium: 1.7.5 Android SDK: 2.3.3 (API 10, Rev 2.)
I'd test it on the 1.7.3 build, but I can't seem to find the SDK url for that version...
Hi, may I know will KraniumJS be upgraded to support Titanium SDK above 2.1?
I won't be doing any more development on it myself. However, there's an updated version in the 0.2 branch of Kranium which should work better with Ti SDK 2.1. But as it seem Kranium won't get much more love, I'd suggest you check out Alloy, which is the officially backed js framework for simplifying Ti development.
9 okt 2012 kl. 02:10 skrev kk_loke86 notifications@github.com:
Hi, may I know will KraniumJS be upgraded to support Titanium SDK above 2.1?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/krawaller/kranium-demo/issues/1#issuecomment-9244915.
Receiving a "Too deep recursion while parsing" (kranium.js) on the Android simulator. Runs quite smoothly on the iPhone.
http://i.imgur.com/LNDAs.png
Host: Mac OSX 10.7 Titanium: 1.7.5 Android SDK: 2.3.3 (API 10, Rev 2.)