Closed MartinHelmut closed 3 years ago
Currently a parameter can be empty:
[params.target] type = []
Should this show as an error to the user or be a valid case? Having it valid would imply that the options can never be defined and this seems rather a bad behaviour.
Explore how an empty type array can be a valid feature.
Never felt necessary to handle this as a special case. Error handling in general is in place. Closed as this will not be a "valid feature".
Description
Currently a parameter can be empty:
Should this show as an error to the user or be a valid case? Having it valid would imply that the options can never be defined and this seems rather a bad behaviour.
Goal
Explore how an empty type array can be a valid feature.