krishnak30 / Toronto_Islands_Ferry_Ticket_Counts

0 stars 0 forks source link

peer review 3#Bo Tang #3

Closed Botangeric closed 1 week ago

Botangeric commented 1 week ago

1.Summary The opening paragraph immediately states that the main results obtained after doing the survey, and after viewing the article, it can be understood that it is summarized very well.The structure of the article is also very well articulated

2.positive point The article in general is very complete, and the author's utilization of LLM is very impressive, the output of the code and the article's suitability is very high, but also site very clear, the article is full of content, so that the reader can quickly understand the current situation

3.Critical Improvements Needed The article in general, the rcode section is mostly fine

4.Suggestions The use of LLM should be put into the README file, and the author should remember to change it.

5.Evaluation The structure of the article is very good and allows someone who doesn't know much about the matter to understand the present situation and the reasons for it with relative ease after reading the article, and the data is summarized very well, making it very intuitive for the reader to understand what the data is stating.

6.Estimated Mark: 57/64

7.Reasoning for the Mark: Very strong statement of the author's point of view, the DATA is very well organized and could be expanded in parts

Rubric: R is appropriately cited: 1 LLM usage: 0 Title: 2 Author, date, repo: 2 Abstract: 4 Introduction: 4 Data: 9 Measurement: 3 Prose: 5 Cross-references: 2 Graphs: 4 Referencing: 4 Commits: 2 Sketches: 2 Simulation: 4 Tests: 4 Reproducibility: 2 Code Style: 1 General excellence:2