Closed jsppr1147 closed 3 months ago
i'm not sure what you mean. you would ordinarily put those azimuth limits in the json (in gnssir_input) and it would save them for you. and when you run gnssir, the results file would have all the region reflector height results mixed up together and sorted by time. so i'm not sure what you mean by parts?
gnssir_input station -azlist2 0 60 100 160 300 360
the latest version of the code has a local coordinates file so i urge you to use it (llh_local.txt). that way you would not have to input the lat lon and height on the command line every time using gnssir_input. the option is described in the file formats description page
https://gnssrefl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pages/file_structure.html
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 3:10 AM JasperMolleno @.***> wrote:
Our area has only vision for 0-60, 100-160, and 300-360 azimuth for water reflections. I'd like to know if there is any workaround for this setup, instead of doing it by parts.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kristinemlarson/gnssrefl/issues/301, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFSDAPFFIP4T2AC7JVWRUYLZOS7TDAVCNFSM6AAAAABLSVKTZ6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGQZTGOBVGU3TGNA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
-- Kristine M. Larson @.*** https://www.kristinelarson.net http://www.kristinelarson.net https://gnss-reflections.org https://github.com/kristinemlarson
Are you waiting for your code to be perfect?
so now i see that you are asking about subdaily. i still don't understand the question - if you use the azlist2 option in gnssir, subdaily will be able to pick up all the results together. is the problem that you are using a very old version of the software, and thus had set up different jsons for different azimuths? which version are you using?
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 3:10 AM JasperMolleno @.***> wrote:
Our area has only vision for 0-60, 100-160, and 300-360 azimuth for water reflections. I'd like to know if there is any workaround for this setup, instead of doing it by parts.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kristinemlarson/gnssrefl/issues/301, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFSDAPFFIP4T2AC7JVWRUYLZOS7TDAVCNFSM6AAAAABLSVKTZ6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGQZTGOBVGU3TGNA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
-- Kristine M. Larson @.*** https://www.kristinelarson.net http://www.kristinelarson.net https://gnss-reflections.org https://github.com/kristinemlarson
Are you waiting for your code to be perfect?
Ohh. I see. I got confused on the -azi1 -azi2 on subdaily. i thought it uses different azimuth constraints aside from the gnssir_input. thanks for the clarification :)
Our area has only vision for 0-60, 100-160, and 300-360 azimuth for water reflections. I'd like to know if there is any workaround for this setup, instead of doing it by parts.