kriswiner
commented
6 years ago Didn;t notice any effect of using zeta. The filter is computationally efficient and produces good results as it is implemented here.
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:30 AM, neroner notifications@github.com wrote:
First of all great work, thanks!
I would like to notice that you define the zeta parameter in the main program but there is no use of zeta parameter in your Madgwick update filter.
In a Magwick's paper entitled 'An efficient orientation filter for inertial and inertial/magnetic sensor arrays,' there is the version with the zeta parameter. You use another version which is available from x-io.co (again from Madgwick).
I have implemented both of versions and I take different results. Can you inform me why you used this version and what is the difference?
Thank you in advanced!
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kriswiner/MPU9250/issues/227, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGY1qmui_s_nt28PCR8EBAqdL35SbOHmks5tKlXHgaJpZM4RdtH- .
neroner
First of all great work, thanks!
I would like to notice that you define the zeta parameter in the main program but there is no use of zeta parameter in your Madgwick update filter.
In a Magwick's paper entitled 'An efficient orientation filter for inertial and inertial/magnetic sensor arrays,' there is the version with the zeta parameter. You use another version which is available from x-io.co (again from Madgwick).
I have implemented both of versions and I take different results. Can you inform me why you used this version and what is the difference?
Thank you in advance!