Closed cdeterman closed 8 years ago
I'm aware of this, I believe this is because https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/3.4/ is unavailable. Not much I can do about it, but you might ask CRAN.
Try switching to R-stable or R-patched for the time being.
Actually, it's not CRAN but R-devel who should be consulted for this (R-devel is R 3.3.0, it's dubious why it's accessing the 3.4 path).
Oh, I see. Then it's dubious why R-devel is 3.4.0... What's 3.3.x then?
This seems to get part of the way there but now the devtools
installation appears to be failing as the dependencies httr
, jsonlite
, mime
, curl
, openssl
fail to install. You can see example here.
@jeroenooms: Is the 3.3.0/3.4.0 confusion due to the new toolchain? I guess it would be safest to default to R-patched for now...
This issue is still a problem and the suggested fixes by krlmlr do not work
@jaredhuling: Could you point me to a failing build?
I should have done that initially. Here it is: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/jaredhuling/oem/build/job/j87ik7jmwh532cw4
Does it work if you add RcppEigen to the "Imports" of your package?
Oh, it looks like RcppEigen only has 64-bit libraries. Could you the following setting in appveyor.yml:
environment:
global:
WARNINGS_ARE_ERRORS: 1
matrix:
- R_VERSION: stable
R_ARCH: x64
See also https://github.com/krlmlr/r-appveyor/blob/7ed23f263873ba51d394b5d2cd5ce451b6c80acf/appveyor.yml#L34 and the surrounding lines.
Could https://github.com/RcppCore/RcppEigen/issues/34 be related?
We do not yet know what https://github.com/RcppCore/RcppEigen/issues/34 actually is as it, not unlike Nessy, has only been spotted in one habitat, the Dortmund CRAN builder. Which has nothing to do with appveyor. So I'd suggest that it may be best not to refer to it at this point.
@eddelbuettel: Thanks for chiming in. I only observe that RcppEigen_0.3.2.8.1.zip downloaded from CRAN doesn't have a "libs/i386" directory.
@krlmlr setting to x64 fixed the issue. Thanks
I am currently having a similar issue where the unavailability of graph
(through Bioconductor) causes the failure. A couple strange things about that particular failure:
WARNINGS_ARE_ERRORS
was not set, yet the error message begins with "Error (converted from warning)".graph
was only included in the installation because it is a dependency of CodeDepends
, which is only a "Suggests" package. drake
and its tests are ready for CodeDepends
to be absent, and I strongly prefer that AppVeyor just roll with it if graph
cannot be installed.So if you set the env var, your build will continue.
@krlmlr maybe you want to set this by default?
cc @jimhester
Thanks, @gaborcsardi! A newer build is continuing as desired. For anyone looking on, I glanced here and set R_REMOTES_NO_ERRORS_FROM_WARNINGS
to true
here in appveyor.yml
.
Thanks. I'd rather keep the defaults lean, but let's watch how this evolves.
Maybe just add support for multiple CRAN-like repos, so that graph and others can be installed automatically? Alternatively, you could use r_install_bioc
to install manually: https://github.com/krlmlr/r-appveyor/blob/2ba367db9ac2550127d4e05f64d9c3ffe824e5fc/r-travis/scripts/travis-tool.sh#L368
You can also setRepositories(ind = 1:4)
before building so that bioc dependencies are automatically available.
Thanks @krlmlr and @jeroen. I may come back to your suggestions depending on how https://github.com/ropensci/drake/issues/41 plays out.
Come to think of it, drake
's AppVeyor builds requiring graph
were actually working until late last night. I see that graph
version 1.58.2 was released recently, so I guess it may have taken some time for the Windows builds to show up on Bioconductor. I like the env var solution because drake
has 26 "Suggests" packages, and except for 2 or 3 of those, I just skip the affected tests when they are not installed.
Hi all,
Please look into using BiocManager::repositories()
and also #125
Thanks.
Thanks. Can someone please open a new issue for discussing integration of BioConductor?
I have had several builds successfully complete previously but suddenly my build is failing complaining about packages not available.
The build page is here
with the relevant lines:
Clearly, these packages should be available as they are all used commonly.