Open jrebecchi opened 4 years ago
Maybe i18n should be performed on the client side ? In this case should we return a string in the error ? Or just a type + code ?
Indeed, we should by putting i18n on the client. I'd be in favor of that choice as it would be easier for the "client lib" users to customize the common error messages.
What do you think ?
Maybe i18n should be performed on the client side ?
In this case should we return a string in the error ? Or just a type + code ?