Closed marcelm closed 1 year ago
Great! Does this PR (ca4febf) also fix the off-by-one error in setting -N
reported in issue https://github.com/ksahlin/strobealign/issues/66?
Ah, I think I just forgot to close #66: I think the off-by-one error has already been fixed by #235 (07dc9e42a3b0e73541eb3ae332c277b34a3cd1a5) by just passing map_params.max_secondary + 1
to the function instead of map_params.max_secondary
. The variable name was still misleading at that point and commit ca4febf now makes it so that the variable actually contains the maximum number of secondary hits (this makes align_SE
consistent with align_PE
consistent in that regard).
I forgot to push a commit updating the changelog. I just pushed that to main directly.
This was a regression introduced in 51eab56e07dbbb88c67772e7cafa4b777646946f: After
best_sam_aln = std::move(sam_aln)
, sam_aln should not be used, but we did use it when appending it to the alignments vector.The actual bugfix is in 6fb332684574a76569bbd29fcce0f787eb4aae51. This PR also sets SEQ and QUAL to
*
for secondary alignments as recommended by the SAM spec (see #212). (I verified that this is what BWA-MEM does as well.)Closes #289 Closes #66