Closed marcusds closed 7 months ago
Small sample size, but for the couple days I've been running this it's worked as intended.
I wonder if it's worth releasing a beta build for?
@HAEdwin
@marcusds I now see what you mean by the second check on # of inverters. Strange this should not be happening. I'd rather would like to find out why this is possible. Give me some time and I'll release the beta.
@HAEdwin Yeah I was wondering if the bug could be entirely worked around with how you are processing the data? I also wonder if that you can't work around it if the whole query should be scrapped because if some data is bad, maybe all data is bad?
Looked into the raw data and put it through my ECU analyzer software, it's just a firmware bug because the checksum (length of datastream) and datamapping is correct so it is easy/better to apply a filter. This should be the final result then, agree?
Sounds good
For more details see #245
This is untested and probably not the right way to do this, I'm not super familiar with Python or this project, but just thought I would give it a whack anyhow.