Closed ricovivid closed 4 years ago
Hey, Thanks!
Curious to know what platform these UAs will result in ?
What browser it will / should resolve into ?
Sorry for the late reply. If it is the Docker-Client UA it should resolve to Docker-Client. If it is the Postman UA it should resolve to Postman.
The goal of the library is to enable light weight pure browser detection. Docker-client in this case is not a pure browser/UA. Isn't it ?
Sorry, I wasn't aware of the purpose of that goal. I will roll my own, thanks.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 1:48 AM Shyju notifications@github.com wrote:
The goal of the library is to enable light weight pure browser detection. Docker-client in this case is not a pure browser/UA. Isn't it ?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kshyju/BrowserDetector/issues/2?email_source=notifications&email_token=AALHIZCCVMFWCSAMPEZXLS3RES5KZA5CNFSM4KLO7YF2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEM2YUSI#issuecomment-590711369, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALHIZHFUQCRQII45XXXMTLRES5KZANCNFSM4KLO7YFQ .
Hello,
Could you add support for the following User Agents:
docker/19.03.5 go/go1.12.12 git-commit/633a0ea kernel/4.9.184-linuxkit os/linux arch/amd64 UpstreamClient(Docker-Client/19.03.5 \(windows\))
PostmanRuntime/7.21.0
< not sure if this one is possible since there is no indication of OSI didn't look much at the code after I read your statement about opening a ticket to request more browser/os combos, but I suppose I could take a stab at forking and adding them, if you couldn't.
Thanks!