Closed granawkins closed 2 years ago
I like it. So the interactive mode should work the same way I guess:
_max
is _base
_max
less than _depth
, reject and ask againOn Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 10:19 PM Ezio Melotti @.***> wrote:
@.**** commented on this pull request.
In karoo_gp/base_class.py https://github.com/kstaats/karoo_gp/pull/77#discussion_r912010420:
@@ -159,7 +159,26 @@ def init(
self.X_hash = None # hash of last-used fit data self.gen_max = gen_max # number of generations to evolve self.swim = swim # culling method
self.tree_depth_max = tree_depth_max # max allowed depth
if tree_depth_max is None: # max allowed depth
default_max = 4
if tree_depth_base > default_max:
If user inputs a base depth larger than the default max
depth, automatically increase the maximum and warn user.
self.tree_depth_max = tree_depth_base
self.log(f'Warning: tree depth base {tree_depth_base} is'
⬇️ Suggested change
self.log(f'Warning: tree depth base {tree_depth_base} is'
self.log(f'Warning: tree depth base {tree_depth_base} is '
In karoo_gp/base_class.py https://github.com/kstaats/karoo_gp/pull/77#discussion_r912053326:
- if tree_depth_max is None: # max allowed depth
- default_max = 4
I don't like too much the default hardcoded here.
Since now the tree_depth_max defaults to None both in the argparse and in the init args, maybe we can just assume that the tree_depth_max is set to whatever the tree_depth_base is unless otherwise specified, and get rid of both the default of 4 and the warning.
- tree_depth_base is either the default (4) or the value passed by the user
- if tree_depth_max is not specified:
- set tree_depth_max = tree_depth_base
- if tree_depth_max is specified:
- if tree_depth_max < tree_depth_base: raise an error
- if tree_depth_max >= tree_depth_base: everything is ok
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kstaats/karoo_gp/pull/77#pullrequestreview-1026291896, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL7VFK5QXKWRY3HWUALWYL3VR4D7TANCNFSM52EUGSCQ . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Fixes #55