Closed nickhir closed 1 year ago
Hi @nickhir,
This is a very good question and there's certainly room for debate, so I can only give my recommendation, not a definitive answer.
So, we did pull a little slight-of-hand in the tutorial code, but it still generally represents my recommended workflow. We used Seurat to calculate the UMAP dimensionality reduction based on the integrated/normalized expression values. This UMAP was used for Slingshot. But since we needed the original raw counts for tradeSeq, we exported the RNA assay when converting back to a SingleCellExperiment. That way, we had the UMAP based on normalized counts for Slingshot and the raw counts for tradeSeq. In general, that is what I would recommend (although I now generally use PCA for Slingshot, and just UMAP for visualization).
Hope this helps and let me know if anything is still unclear! Best, Kelly
Thank you very much for your answer. This definitely cleared things up for me!
Hi,
I have 8 different experiments that I have integrated using Seurat. I now want to perform trajectory analysis with slingshot, but I am unsure what assay to use (either
seurat@RNA$integrated
orseurat@assays$integrated
).In issue #59 you mentioned that you "fell most comfortable using the integrated counts". However, in the tutorial that you mention in the same issue ´, I am pretty sure that you are using the "unintegrated" counts (i.e. the RNA assay), because you are specifically exporting the RNA assay back to a single cell experiment and not the "integrated" assay.
Do you have any new insights or recommendations regarding this issue?
Any help is much appreciated!