Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I'll look into this.
Original comment by si...@gmail.com
on 12 Jun 2007 at 2:18
Well, direct_io is ugly by nature and in many ways, it _does_ mean that one is
ignoring the file size. In your
example case, you want the file size to be "correct", so there's a conflict,
really. Even though invalidating the
cached attributes will make it "work" in your example case, you still
can't/shouldn't depend on the size always if
you use direct_io.
Anyway, I'll probably add a "fix" in the next release so your example case
works.
Original comment by si...@gmail.com
on 26 Jun 2007 at 8:23
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jchan...@gmail.com
on 12 Jun 2007 at 10:34