Closed kuanb closed 6 years ago
Something's up:
Original run time was 92.79 seconds Now, with MP on: 465.67 seconds And with MP off: 254.18 seconds
So, somehow went to 4 min serialized and 7+ min parallelized. Need to look into what is causing this.
Merging #80 into master will increase coverage by
0.45%
. The diff coverage is96.1%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #80 +/- ##
=========================================
+ Coverage 90.85% 91.3% +0.45%
=========================================
Files 12 13 +1
Lines 776 828 +52
=========================================
+ Hits 705 756 +51
- Misses 71 72 +1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
peartree/parallel/route_processor.py | 97.87% <100%> (ø) |
|
peartree/parallel/trip_times_interpolator.py | 95.34% <95.34%> (ø) |
|
peartree/summarizer.py | 91.21% <96.87%> (+1.28%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3778d4e...6d72ca0. Read the comment docs.
Hrm. So it looks like perf is more like:
w/ AC Transit No MP: 146.8s Yes MP: 214.3s
And meanwhile old version still runs in 92.8s. Not good.
Removal of df appending gets us down to 80s and 100s for no MP and MP. Which is acceptable since AC is a smaller reference layer. Gonna be happy with this for now.
Fixes https://github.com/kuanb/peartree/issues/79