Closed shashank-boyapally closed 2 months ago
Isn't the registry image registry status already verified by the cluster operators check?
🤔
I think this PR won't be necessary, if I understood correctly, @venkataanil wasn't passing the --check-health
flag to the kube-burner-ocp command, with it the registry readiness should be checked upfront.
@shashank-boyapally , maybe we should enable this flag by default?, wdyt @jtaleric @afcollins @venkataanil ?
I was thinking since we get the list of installed operators
, we cannot check the condition of image-registry
if it is not present, hence I added an additional check, if I'm not mistaken image-registry is not present when we spin up a bm instance, please correct me if I'm wrong. Yes, we can enable the flag to default true.
Looks like the image-registry is present, hence we might not need explicit check to image-registry. Please confirm if I can close this PR as not needed anymore.
Its better we get a BM deployment and reporduce this issue and then find root cause and fix it. We can retain this PR till then.
find root cause
@venkataanil We know it already. Bare metal deployments do not include the image-registry by default.
It is documented as a Day 2 operation.
Configuring a registry is not something kube-burner would do.
Something is wrong with latest rebase... 9 commits?
Type of change
Description
Added image registry check for kube-burner-ocp, this can be used for bare-metal instances where image-registry co is not present by default.
Related Tickets & Documents
Checklist before requesting a review