I was trying to get the Istio resources working which do not specify their status fields but rather use x-kubernetes-preserve-unknown-fields. Currently kopium does not generate a XyzStatus struct for that but still adds a #[kube(status = "XyzStatus")] line to the spec struct which causes compile errors. This PR changes that so that the status line is only added if we have an actual status container and that container has members. In every other case, kopium does not generate a status struct and uses a BTreeMap instead which cannot be used in the #[kube(status = ...)] line.
I was trying to get the Istio resources working which do not specify their
statusfields but rather usex-kubernetes-preserve-unknown-fields. Currently kopium does not generate aXyzStatusstruct for that but still adds a#[kube(status = "XyzStatus")]line to thespecstruct which causes compile errors. This PR changes that so that the status line is only added if we have an actual status container and that container has members. In every other case, kopium does not generate a status struct and uses a BTreeMap instead which cannot be used in the#[kube(status = ...)]line.I'm not entirely sure if this breaks anything else down the line, however I was able to generate &
cargo checkevery custom resource in https://github.com/metio/kube-custom-resources-rs/pull/222 with this change.