kubeflow / blog

Kubeflow blog based on fastpages
https://blog.kubeflow.org
Apache License 2.0
16 stars 38 forks source link

add dependabot config script #64

Open davidspek opened 3 years ago

davidspek commented 3 years ago

Inspired by https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/issues/4682 I created a script that will create a config file for depandabot so that it knows what directories to scan. It will scan the repository for files named *ockerfile*, package*.json, *requirements.txt, go.* and Gemfile*. It is setup for dockerfiles, npm packages, pip, ruby and gomod dependencies at the moment. It is trivial to further customize what folders are selected if further customization is needed. It also parses the closest OWNERS file for a given dependency listing file, and assigns the relevant approvers and adds the relevant reviewers to the PRs it creates.

This is a sibling PR to https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/pull/5015, https://github.com/kubeflow/kubeflow/pull/5542, https://github.com/kubeflow/kfserving/pull/1309, https://github.com/kubeflow/arena/pull/403, https://github.com/kubeflow/testing/pull/855, https://github.com/kubeflow/fairing/pull/550, https://github.com/kubeflow/kfp-tekton/pull/432, https://github.com/kubeflow/katib/pull/1420, https://github.com/kubeflow/tf-operator/pull/1224, https://github.com/kubeflow/kfp-tekton-backend/pull/28, https://github.com/kubeflow/mpi-operator/pull/319, https://github.com/kubeflow/pytorch-operator/pull/315, https://github.com/kubeflow/metadata/pull/255, https://github.com/kubeflow/xgboost-operator/pull/107, https://github.com/kubeflow/fate-operator/pull/26, https://github.com/kubeflow/mxnet-operator/pull/87, https://github.com/kubeflow/website/pull/2459, https://github.com/kubeflow/kfctl/pull/479, https://github.com/kubeflow/examples/pull/843, https://github.com/kubeflow/code-intelligence/pull/198, https://github.com/kubeflow/gcp-blueprints/pull/192 and https://github.com/kubeflow/common/pull/107.

As it stands now, there will be about 11 PRs that will be created with this configuration.

For reference, the PRs that will be created can be found here: https://github.com/DavidSpek/blog/pulls

davidspek commented 3 years ago

/assign kramachandran

k8s-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

@DavidSpek: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: kramachandran.

Note that only kubeflow members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to [this](https://github.com/kubeflow/blog/pull/64#issuecomment-766886505): >/assign kramachandran Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
davidspek commented 3 years ago

/assign @terrytangyuan

k8s-ci-robot commented 3 years ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DavidSpek, terrytangyuan To complete the pull request process, please assign after the PR has been reviewed. You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - **[OWNERS](https://github.com/kubeflow/blog/blob/master/OWNERS)** Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment
davidspek commented 3 years ago

@terrytangyuan I wasn't able to assign the owner of the repo @kramachandran as he isn't a member of Kubeflow. Who should be assigned to approve this?

davidspek commented 3 years ago

I am holding the PR to have some control over when it gets merged so that the optional test infra doesn't get overloaded if all the repo's were to merge this at the same time. /hold

Bobgy commented 3 years ago

I think we don't need this for kubeflow/blog, do we?

davidspek commented 3 years ago

@Bobgy does look like there are things that need to be kept up to date. https://github.com/DavidSpek/blog/pulls