search

kubeflow / community

Information about the Kubeflow community including proposals and governance information.
Apache License 2.0
159 stars 220 forks source link

Merge security and manifests WG meeting in a cal entry #725

Closed rimolive closed 4 months ago

juliusvonkohout commented 5 months ago

CC @kimwnasptd @akgraner for review

juliusvonkohout commented 5 months ago

@kimwnasptd are you alright with the organizer change and should we switch to the new Zoom as well?

rimolive commented 5 months ago

As it says at the top of this file, never remove a recurring meeting from this file otherwise it will end up in the calendar forever.

You have to move it to the legacy section and set its end date in the past.

My apologies to that. I made the changes as requested.

rimolive commented 5 months ago

cc @kubeflow/kubeflow-steering-committee @juliusvonkohout @kimwnasptd

juliusvonkohout commented 4 months ago

/lgtm

I will probably add the new zoom bridge in a follow up PR.

kimwnasptd commented 4 months ago

/lgtm

juliusvonkohout commented 4 months ago

/assign @yuzliu

juliusvonkohout commented 4 months ago

/lgtm

thesuperzapper commented 4 months ago

I just saw that the proposed meeting is named Kubeflow Platform Meeting (Manifests + Security WG).

It's hard to imagine that "Kubeflow Platform" should not also involve the distribution owners? I am not sure we should be calling the meetings "Kubeflow Platform" if they are only referring to Manifests/Security WGs.

juliusvonkohout commented 4 months ago

I just saw that the proposed meeting is named Kubeflow Platform Meeting (Manifests + Security WG).

It's hard to imagine that "Kubeflow Platform" should not also involve the distribution owners? I am not sure we should be calling the meetings "Kubeflow Platform" if they are only referring to Manifests/Security WGs.

Then lets ask @andreyvelich @terrytangyuan @jbottum what they think. Based on what they decide we could change it.

andreyvelich commented 4 months ago

From my perspective, this meeting should be the main place for users if they have questions related to Kubeflow Platform components. For example, questions about Profile Controller, KFAM, Central Dashboard, etc.

Distributions should certainly join these calls since they are main consumers of Kubeflow Manifests.

juliusvonkohout commented 4 months ago

From my perspective, this meeting should be the main place for users if they have questions related to Kubeflow Platform components. For example, questions about Profile Controller, KFAM, Central Dashboard, etc.

Distributions should certainly join these calls since they are main consumers of Kubeflow Manifests.

Can you approve it then or do we have to make changes?

google-oss-prow[bot] commented 4 months ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: terrytangyuan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[calendar/OWNERS](https://github.com/kubeflow/community/blob/master/calendar/OWNERS)~~ [terrytangyuan] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment