Closed Jeffwan closed 5 months ago
/cc @PatrickXYS will help on the example update.
Cool! Thanks for willing to help
/assign @PatrickXYS
@Bobgy: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: PatrickXYS.
Note that only kubeflow members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. For more information please see the contributor guide
@Jeffwan I still remember last time we talked about this issue, we'll figure out what Apache Beam version will TFX team use, and if they're not planning using 2.19 version, we should talk with them to see how it goes.
/assign @PatrickXYS
@PatrickXYS vanila TFX still use beam 2.17, Let me file a ticket in TFX to upgrade to 2.19. This is currently blocked. We probably can revisit this later
It looks like TFX is currently not compatible with Apache Beam 2.19, see https://github.com/tensorflow/tfx/issues/1219
It looks like TFX is currently not compatible with Apache Beam 2.19, see tensorflow/tfx#1219
Yes. It maybe not a simple version upgrade. Let's track in the issue there. I create another one for upgrade https://github.com/tensorflow/tfx/issues/1446
The latest TFX release still uses beam 2.17.0 . So the issue is still blocking there.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity. Please comment "/reopen" to reopen it.
/reopen
@PatrickXYS: Reopened this issue.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Not yet fixed
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
not yet fixed
Closing this issue. No activity for a while.
/close
@rimolive: Closing this issue.
Improvement:
We have a lot of pain in https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/issues/596. AWS user have to use EFS or other ReadWriteMany storage for taxi examples. S3 FileSystem (Python) has been implemented in Apache-Beam 2.19.0, then we can leverage this to simplify taxi example.