Closed andreyvelich closed 3 weeks ago
Totals | |
---|---|
Change from base Build 11507477280: | 0.0% |
Covered Lines: | 77 |
Relevant Lines: | 77 |
Should we consider unit or e2e tests for this?
Should we consider unit or e2e tests for this?
Yeah, I will open dedicated issue for it.
I wonder if we can add some comment somewhere to let users know we only support downloading models/datasets from HuggingFace now?
Yes, we are planning to add supported dataset and model providers to the website. Additionally, I will create tracking issue to support more providers (S3, GCS, etc.)
Are there any other comments before we can move forward with this initial PR ? /assign @kannon92 @Electronic-Waste @deepanker13 @varshaprasad96 @saileshd1402
@andreyvelich: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: varshaprasad96, saileshd1402.
Note that only kubeflow members with read permissions, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. For more information please see the contributor guide
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: tenzen-y
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
Fixes: https://github.com/kubeflow/training-operator/issues/2210
I created model and dataset initializers. Initially, we will only support HF for the demo purposes. I will create dedicated issue to support more providers.
/assign @kubeflow/wg-training-leads @varshaprasad96 @akshaychitneni @deepanker13 @helenxie-bit @Electronic-Waste @saileshd1402 @kannon92