Closed carlory closed 2 months ago
/cc @deepakkinni @xing-yang
To add a new RBAC rule, we need to bump the major version.
To add a new RBAC rule, we need to bump the major version.
I think we should probably do this following the K8s 1.30 release.
Can we use patch instead of update?
Can we use patch instead of update?
cc @deepakkinni
Can we use patch instead of update?
Unfortunately, we use update https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/sig-storage-lib-external-provisioner/blob/master/controller/controller.go#L1322-L1328
Having read about Patch now, I do see its benefits. Would you prefer if we switched out the update to patch?
Yes, try to switch to patch, please.
/hold
Waiting for https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/sig-storage-lib-external-provisioner/pull/164 merged.
Can you change from "update verb" to "patch verb" in the release note?
@xing-yang updated.
/approve
@carlory Can we cancel the hold?
/hold cancel
/lgtm /approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: carlory, deepakkinni, xing-yang
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
/hold
we need to bump the vendor
cc @xing-yang
/hold cancel
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
the feature-gate HonorPVReclaimPolicy is enabled, create a pvc with a delete relaim policy, then delete the pvc, the pv stuck in deleting status, the error message is:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: