kubernetes-retired / cluster-api-provider-nested

Cluster API Provider for Nested Clusters
Apache License 2.0
301 stars 67 forks source link

CAPN doesn't seem to work outside of a kind scenario #353

Closed hrak closed 7 months ago

hrak commented 1 year ago

What steps did you take and what happened:

I tested this provider in a kind test setup, and then everything worked fine. Then i moved it to a 'real' Kubernetes cluster, and the control planes created by CAPN never reach ready state, because all startup/liveness/readiness probes fail.

All startup/liveness/readiness probes are configured/hardcoded to use 127.0.0.1, but since all pods are configured to not use host networking (for obvious reasons), all these checks are hitting the host instead of the pods, and are failing. All services eventually end up in CrashLoopBackoff and the NestedControlPlane never comes up.

I don't know why this does magically work in kind.

Am i missing something, or was the NestedControlPlane never intended to work outside of a kind scenario?

What did you expect to happen:

The NestedControlPlane to come up

Anything else you would like to add: [Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]

Environment:

/kind bug [One or more /area label. See https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-nested/labels?q=area for the list of labels]

k8s-triage-robot commented 9 months ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot commented 8 months ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

k8s-triage-robot commented 7 months ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

k8s-ci-robot commented 7 months ago

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to [this](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-nested/issues/353#issuecomment-2027890156): >The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. > >This bot triages issues according to the following rules: >- After 90d of inactivity, `lifecycle/stale` is applied >- After 30d of inactivity since `lifecycle/stale` was applied, `lifecycle/rotten` is applied >- After 30d of inactivity since `lifecycle/rotten` was applied, the issue is closed > >You can: >- Reopen this issue with `/reopen` >- Mark this issue as fresh with `/remove-lifecycle rotten` >- Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] > >Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at [kubernetes/community](https://github.com/kubernetes/community). > >/close not-planned > >[1]: https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/issue-triage/ Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.