Closed rajansandeep closed 4 years ago
/uncc /cc @justinsb @johnsonj
LGTM, but can we / should we keep 1.6.9 available?
Currently, I've been adding the versions that are being released with upstream k8s (CoreDNS 1.7.0 will be shipped with 1.19 etc.), but I can certainly keep 1.6.9.
Currently, I've been adding the versions that are being released with upstream k8s (CoreDNS 1.7.0 will be shipped with 1.19 etc.),
Ah - that's a reasonable strategy. If no version of k8s shipped with 1.6.9, then I don't think we need to keep it at this stage. nce we get everyone using the operator, then we should expect that some people will pin versions, and once we support a version we should not generally stop supporting it.
It's easy enough to add 1.6.9 back if we do need it, so approving :-)
/approve /lgtm
Thanks @rajansandeep :-)
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb, rajansandeep
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
Updates from v1.6.9 to v1.7.0 Also updates the corresponding migration library to support v1.7.0