Open devigned opened 3 years ago
we should also take a look at work done in the CAPA provider to use the KCP port: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws/pull/3063
EDIT: I take that back, I don't think that PR is taking the right approach. Added a comment.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
/help
@CecileRobertMichon: This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor.
Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions:
For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see here and ensure that they are met.
If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed
by commenting with the /remove-help
command.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the PR is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
I would like to help on this issue. /assign xiujuanx
/kind feature
The LB exposed port for the API Server should be configurable on its own without affecting the backend port the LB directs traffic to in the backend pool. For example, the LB for API Server is exposed on 443, but the backend pool is serving traffic on 6443.
Anything else you would like to add: [Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.] See https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/issues/5517#issuecomment-954725794