Open mouad-eh opened 4 months ago
I think that would be a new feature to support that use case. Right now a cluster manages one network and one subnet for both the machines and the LB. I take a deeper look a bit later this week and report back any finding.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
/kind bug
What steps did you take and what happened: I am trying to create a cluster where the loadbalancer is in a different subnet from the cluster nodes. The OpenstackCluster CR is defined as follows:
What did you expect to happen: I was expecting the loadbalancer to be created within \<LB-SUBNET-ID> but instead it was created in \<NODES-SUBNET-ID>.
Anything else you would like to add: I think the reason behind this is that the function responsible for creating the loadbalancer is getting the subnet-id from the state and the state in my case is set after the loadbalancer and its subresources (listners, pools ..etc) are created.
Environment:
git rev-parse HEAD
if manually built): v0.10.4kubectl version
): v1.27.3 for client and v1.29.5 for server/etc/os-release
): redhat9