search

kubernetes-sigs / cluster-api-provider-packet

Cluster API Provider Packet (now Equinix Metal)
https://deploy.equinix.com/labs/cluster-api-provider-packet/
Apache License 2.0
99 stars 41 forks source link

Add support for MachinePool Machines in CAPP #680

Open displague opened 8 months ago

displague commented 8 months ago

User Story

As a developer, I'd like to have PacketMachinePools support MachinePool Machines by leveraging the new logic in CAPI core. This way, other providers have an example implementation to follow.

Detailed Description

Since MachinePool Machines have landed in CAPI core, we want to also include changes in CAPP to implement it. Now that we can use PacketMachines with MachinePools, we can also clean up a lot of redundant code by reusing the same logic as well.

Anything else you would like to add:

References and implementations:

k8s-triage-robot commented 5 months ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot commented 4 months ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

k8s-triage-robot commented 3 months ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

k8s-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to [this](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-packet/issues/680#issuecomment-2094302713): >The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. > >This bot triages issues according to the following rules: >- After 90d of inactivity, `lifecycle/stale` is applied >- After 30d of inactivity since `lifecycle/stale` was applied, `lifecycle/rotten` is applied >- After 30d of inactivity since `lifecycle/rotten` was applied, the issue is closed > >You can: >- Reopen this issue with `/reopen` >- Mark this issue as fresh with `/remove-lifecycle rotten` >- Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] > >Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at [kubernetes/community](https://github.com/kubernetes/community). > >/close not-planned > >[1]: https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/issue-triage/ Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
cprivitere commented 3 months ago

/reopen

cprivitere commented 3 months ago

/remove-lifecycle rotten

k8s-ci-robot commented 3 months ago

@cprivitere: Reopened this issue.

In response to [this](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-packet/issues/680#issuecomment-2110659144): >/reopen Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
cprivitere commented 3 months ago

/triage accepted