search

kubernetes-sigs / cluster-api

Home for Cluster API, a subproject of sig-cluster-lifecycle
https://cluster-api.sigs.k8s.io
Apache License 2.0
3.59k stars 1.33k forks source link

MD.Status.ReadyReplicas changes from 3 to 0 when machineset_controller updateStatus() hits "Unable to retrieve Node status" error #10195

Open jessehu opened 9 months ago

jessehu commented 9 months ago

What steps did you take and what happened?

When calling clusterctlclient.Client.ApplyUpgrade(upgrade) to upgrade CAPI core components (its version is not changed) and a CAPI Infra Provider component(the version is changed), there is a very low probability that capi-controller-manager pod is restarted. Both capi-controller-manager pod log and pod previous log contains the error log "Unable to retrieve Node status":

E0223 18:31:51.557569 1 machineset_controller.go:883] "Unable to retrieve Node status" err="failed to create cluster accessor: failed to get lock for cluster: cluster is locked already" controller="machineset" controllerGroup="cluster.x-k8s.io" controllerKind="MachineSet" MachineSet="e2e-mycluster-v1-24-106-sks-upgrade/e2e-50a8u5-sks-upgrade-3m3w-workers-bkzcs" namespace="e2e-mycluster-v1-24-106-sks-upgrade" name="e2e-50a8u5-sks-upgrade-3m3w-workers-bkzcs" reconcileID=b9a3b2d2-00e9-4d0f-97b4-f2448292404d MachineDeployment="e2e-mycluster-v1-24-106-sks-upgrade/e2e-50a8u5-sks-upgrade-3m3w-workers" Cluster="e2e-mycluster-v1-24-106-sks-upgrade/e2e-50a8u5-sks-upgrade-3m3w" Machine="e2e-mycluster-v1-24-106-sks-upgrade/e2e-50a8u5-sks-upgrade-3m3w-workers-bkzcs-75tm4" node=""

This error causes the MD.Status.ReadyReplicas changes from 3 to 0 and after about 90s it will be changed back to 3. The reason is updateStatus() in machineset_controller.go ignores the error returned by getMachineNode() and treats the Node as not ready. In the mean time, KCP.Status.ReadyReplicas changes from 3 to 2 and back to 3 (after about only 8 seconds), and the reason might be kcp Reconcile() issues a requeue immediately after hitting ErrClusterLocked error.

Our code on top of CAPI watches MD.Status.ReadyReplicas and leads to an issue when MD.Status.ReadyReplicas changes from 3 to 0.

What did you expect to happen?

Cluster API version

1.5.2

Kubernetes version

1.24.17

Anything else you would like to add?

To avoid MD.Status.ReadyReplicas change in this case, we can return error rather than contiune at https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/blob/v1.5.2/internal/controllers/machineset/machineset_controller.go#L882-L884 when the error is ErrClusterLocked (or even return error on any error).

Label(s) to be applied

/kind bug One or more /area label. See https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/labels?q=area for the list of labels.

fabriziopandini commented 9 months ago

/triage needs-discussion

I would like to get @vincepri, @sbueringer, and @JoelSpeed opinions on this one.

Currently, we consider available a replica for which we know it has node ready, and this seems semantically correct to me.

The downside of this formulation is that available can flick whenever the node status changes, or whenever there are connection problems to the workload cluster and we cannot retrieve the node status anymore (like in this use case).

If this is still the behavior we all want, then IMO the behavior of KCP and MD is correct: they should both reduce the number of available replicas based on the info available at a given time.

However, what we can do is

jessehu commented 9 months ago

Thanks @fabriziopandini. The error ErrClusterLocked should be gone in a short time, so marking the Node as notReady or unknown replica immediately after hitting error ErrClusterLocked might be over responsive. Also considering kube-controller-manager marks a Node as unhealthy after 40s unresponsive state.

--node-monitor-grace-period duration     Default: 40s
Amount of time which we allow running Node to be unresponsive before marking it unhealthy.
Must be N times more than kubelet's nodeStatusUpdateFrequency, where N means number
of retries allowed for kubelet to post node status.
jessehu commented 9 months ago

BTW this could also impacted by https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/pull/9810 discussed in https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/issues/10165#issuecomment-1952727622

JoelSpeed commented 9 months ago

Yes I think we may want to take a leaf out of KCMs book here and not immediately flick to the unready state. I would expect in the real world that users monitor things like unready nodes and, want to remediate that situation. Going unready early may lead to false positive alerts.

I think in this case specifically, the ErrClusterLocked, we would want to leave the Nodes in whatever state they were previously in, and requeue the request to try again in say 20s. Do we track when we last observed the Node currently? We probably also want to have a timeout on this behaviour. If we haven't seen the Node in x time then we assume its status is unknown

jessehu commented 8 months ago

I made a PR to fix this bug with a simple approach (not implementing unknownReplicas). Please kindly take a look. Thanks!

jessehu commented 8 months ago

/area machineset

fabriziopandini commented 7 months ago

/priority important-longterm

chrischdi commented 7 months ago

Note: CAPI v1.7 has fixes for the ErrClusterLocked error:

Did we already test if this is still an issue with v1.7.0-rc.1 or so? (v1.7.0 will be released today)

jessehu commented 7 months ago

Thanks @chrischdi. That PR solves the reconcile latence when hitting ErrClusterLocked errors. This issue describes the issue " MD.Status.ReadyReplicas changes from 3 to 0" when hitting ErrClusterLocked error for the first time.

chrischdi commented 7 months ago

Yeah just noted when reading code:

The fix it may not directly change the above behavior, but it would lead to retrying every minute.

k8s-ci-robot commented 7 months ago

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

CAPI contributors will take a look as soon as possible, apply one of the triage/* labels and provide further guidance.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
k8s-triage-robot commented 4 months ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

jessehu commented 4 months ago

/remove-lifecycle stale There is a PR for resolving this issue, although with some concern: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/pull/10436

fabriziopandini commented 4 months ago

PTAL https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/pull/10897

The new RemoteConnectionProbe condition and related --remote-connection-grace-period --remote-conditions-grace-period flags are laying the foundation for handling connection issues with the workload cluster in a consistent way across all the controllers.

k8s-triage-robot commented 1 month ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot commented 2 days ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten