Closed yastij closed 3 years ago
/priority important-soon
/assign
Agreed, the CAEP is the right place for reaching an agreement on this topic Personally, I'm ok with adding more info to CAPI conditions it this can provide value to consumers (humans or machines); for this issue, we should aim to have a clear distinction between Severity Warning/Error and the proposed state
/milestone v0.4.0
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.
User Story
today CAPI condition do not allow granular distinction between different types of conditions:
Detailed Description
I'll amend the CAPI condition CAEP with more information
cc @vincepri @fabriziopandini @CecileRobertMichon
Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]
/kind feature