implement mvp release tooling

[BlaineEXE]

Implement minimum viable release tooling. Tooling has these goals:

1. make build target for local development
2. K8s-compliant GCP cloudbuild config for multi-arch release images
3. allow future use of depandabot with little to no change
4. keep build tooling as simple as possible

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @BlaineEXE!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/container-object-storage-interface-controller 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/container-object-storage-interface-controller has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. :smiley:

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @BlaineEXE. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[BlaineEXE]

tag: @wlan @xing-yang @shanduur

[xing-yang]

/ok-to-test

[k8s-ci-robot]

@BlaineEXE: The /retest command does not accept any targets. The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

• /test pull-container-object-storage-interface-controller-build
• /test pull-container-object-storage-interface-controller-unit

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to [this](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/container-object-storage-interface-controller/pull/79#issuecomment-1718045297): >/retest pull-container-object-storage-interface-controller-build Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[BlaineEXE]

/test pull-container-object-storage-interface-controller-build

Re-run this test with updated 'build' test in Prow: https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/pull/30700

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BlaineEXE, wlan0

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/container-object-storage-interface-controller/blob/master/OWNERS)~~ [wlan0] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.