Open pleshakov opened 6 months ago
Hi @pleshakov , I would love to contribute to this one. /assign
Hi @yashvardhan-kukreja
Hi @pleshakov , I would love to contribute to this one.
that's great! I'd recommend to wait until any of the maintainers replied that this issue makes sense or ask this question in the gateway api slack channel https://gateway-api.sigs.k8s.io/contributing/#communications , to double check this work is needed.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
I agree that this would be a useful test to have. @yashvardhan-kukreja or @pleshakov do either of you have time to work on this?
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale /help
@robscott: This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor.
Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions:
For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see here and ensure that they are met.
If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed
by commenting with the /remove-help
command.
I'm interested to work on this
What would you like to be added:
A conformance test for traffic splitting in GRPCRoute -- https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api/blob/729d38f9bf17ff72d17f0148452416551296f67c/apis/v1alpha2/grpcroute_types.go#L271
Why this is needed:
Increase conformance feature coverage of GRPCRoute