Open rtribotte opened 5 days ago
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: rtribotte Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign thockin for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Hi @rtribotte. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test
on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.
Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test
label.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
/ok-to-test
This seems reasonable, but I'll need to have a think about it in case it counts as a breaking change.
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR aligns the
HTTPRouteTimeouts.BackendRequest
timeout documentation. It is stated in the GEP 1742 sequence diagram illustrating the timeouts boundaries that theHTTPRouteTimeouts.BackendRequest
timeout runs until the responses headers are received: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api/blob/f73504594cf85d36681e064d2932d66608d135e2/geps/gep-1742/index.md?plain=1#L358-L360The documentation for the CRD was mentioning a timeout running until the end of the response, which is not consistent and this PR aims to align expectations.
On the side, in the GEP 1742, the Traefik mermaid sequence diagram is adjusted to reflect more accurately the actual supported timeouts.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: