search

kubernetes-sigs / ingress-controller-conformance

Repository for a compliance specification of ingress-controllers.
Apache License 2.0
43 stars 36 forks source link

gRPC conformance server #106

Closed gnossen closed 9 months ago

gnossen commented 1 year ago

Adds a gRPC conformance server for use in the GRPCRoute conformance tests.

k8s-ci-robot commented 1 year ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gnossen Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign thockin for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - **[OWNERS](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ingress-controller-conformance/blob/master/OWNERS)** Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment
k8s-ci-robot commented 1 year ago

Welcome @gnossen!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/ingress-controller-conformance 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/ingress-controller-conformance has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. :smiley:

k8s-ci-robot commented 1 year ago

Hi @gnossen. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
gnossen commented 1 year ago

@shaneutt

shaneutt commented 1 year ago

/cc

gnossen commented 1 year ago

Thanks for the review!

Main thing was it feels like we should try and add some tests for the Go code.

Does that mean in-repo unit tests? Or are the accompanying conformance tests sufficient?

I also got some feedback from @robscott that this should probably live in the gateway-api repo, so after this round of review, I'll be moving this PR there.

shaneutt commented 1 year ago

I think some unit tests would ultimately be good, it will help future contributors reduce the risk of accidentally breaking something in the test server.

k8s-triage-robot commented 1 year ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot commented 10 months ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

k8s-triage-robot commented 9 months ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

k8s-ci-robot commented 9 months ago

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

In response to [this](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/ingress-controller-conformance/pull/106#issuecomment-1950663627): >The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. > >This bot triages PRs according to the following rules: >- After 90d of inactivity, `lifecycle/stale` is applied >- After 30d of inactivity since `lifecycle/stale` was applied, `lifecycle/rotten` is applied >- After 30d of inactivity since `lifecycle/rotten` was applied, the PR is closed > >You can: >- Reopen this PR with `/reopen` >- Mark this PR as fresh with `/remove-lifecycle rotten` >- Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] > >Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at [kubernetes/community](https://github.com/kubernetes/community). > >/close > >[1]: https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/issue-triage/ Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.