Closed sanposhiho closed 1 year ago
dependent on #13, but sounds good
/assign
/close
I now know it's a quite bad/impossible idea to make both interface same. We can come back here when the allocation or GC performance gets improved, but for now, just close it
@sanposhiho: Closing this issue.
ps this makes things closer, and the important thing is benchmark driven and still get a lot closer to the host interface. https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kube-scheduler-wasm-extension/pull/32
What would you like to be added:
people can implement wasm based plugins in very similar interface of the plugins in scheduling framework.
Why is this needed:
You can see how to implement the guest in the example. It's now quite different from how we implement the scheduler plugins.
To reduce the learning cost for people and to make it easy to convert from existing plugins to wasm-based plugins, we want to reduce the difference from the scheduler's plugin interface as much as possible.
Completion requirements:
This enhancement requires the following artifacts:
The artifacts should be linked in subsequent comments.