Closed stephanhorsthemke closed 1 year ago
Hi @stephanhorsthemke. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test
on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.
Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test
label.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
/ok-to-test
/assign @justinsb Could you review this? And CI test failed, is this flaky one?
@justinsb
I checked the result on prow job.
And I created the update on forked my repo to pass the job.
Using this update, hack/ci/test.sh
passed with success on my laptop.
But I wonder if my update is valid, because I updated the expected data.
Hey all and thanks for the swift reviews! I unblocked myself with this branch already and have trouble to prioritise this now. @atoato88 or anybody else, Please just feel free and take this over. Your changes look good. Maybe we could merge this into another branch in the upstream repo so you have all the permissions?
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: stephanhorsthemke Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from justinsb. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Alright. I just went ahead and at least did what @atoato88 did in his branch to see if that fixes all the tests!
What I can't answer is if it is alright and fine that the expected client is different now!
Umm, test result was not success, I will update my commit.
I created the update. Could you merge this?
I created the update. Could you merge this?
@camilamacedo86 @stephanhorsthemke the update is usefully to pull-declarative-test
. Should we update and merge ?
It's block https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/pull/3421
@justinsb Gentle ping. Could you review this?
Thanks for you PR. If you have no time, I will open PR https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder-declarative-pattern/pull/337 which contain your commit informations. If you want to start agains. I would close https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder-declarative-pattern/pull/337.
@stephanhorsthemke: The following test failed, say /retest
to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required
to rerun all mandatory failed tests:
Test name | Commit | Details | Required | Rerun command |
---|---|---|---|---|
pull-declarative-test | 945f0f573142ce39e32aad789a03bcc19271b779 | link | true | /test pull-declarative-test |
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.
Amazing @kkkkun Thanks for taking over. I haven't had the time to follow up on this until now so that's great! I'll close this PR.
What this PR does / why we need it: Bumps controller-runtime and fixes breaking changes
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder-declarative-pattern/issues/333.
Special notes for your reviewer: This PR already unblocks me as I'll just point the go mod to this commit. I don't have much familiarity with the changes and we should maybe put some more thoughts into some of the changes.
Locally I had some test failures also on master and they looked similar
Additional documentation: