Closed robertvolkmann closed 1 month ago
Hi @robertvolkmann. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test
on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.
Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test
label.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
Is it necessary to upgrade containerd in Kubespray version 2.26? I want to avoid the issue of package downgrades that occurred when upgrading from version 2.24.3 to 2.25.
/hold
Release v2.25.1 will contain containerd 1.7.22, so at least 1.7.22 should be part of a future v2.26.1.
Is it necessary to upgrade containerd in Kubespray version 2.26? I want to avoid the issue of package downgrades that occurred when upgrading from version 2.24.3 to 2.25.
Given #11642 It does not seem to be a problem ? /approve /lgtm /ok-to-test (leaving the hold until we figure this out).
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: robertvolkmann, VannTen
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
@tico88612 Any issue with merging this given the master had been updated as well ?
I think it's no problem here. /unhold
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Manual cherry-pick of #11642
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #11641
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: