Closed kaisoz closed 12 hours ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | d5a7bb776c0b99625553d4afc1892f86f3ffb202 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-kueue/deploys/674384266f05db00087ccac3 |
/lgtm Awesome. Thanks! As a follow-up, it would be nice to update the tests to use the .Ref() method.
LGTM label has been added.
/lgtm Awesome. Thanks! As a follow-up, it would be nice to update the tests to use the .Ref() method.
Thanks! 😊 I see that other reviewers have concerns on the method... what's your take on it? It feels that I should go with the cast to ResourceFlavorReference
and then assess?
/lgtm Awesome. Thanks! As a follow-up, it would be nice to update the tests to use the .Ref() method.
Thanks! 😊 I see that other reviewers have concerns on the method... what's your take on it? It feels that I should go with the cast to
ResourceFlavorReference
and then assess?
Yes, please, cast to ResourceFlavorReference
🙏
@mbobrovskyi @mimowo @tenzen-y changes added. PTAL 😊 Thanks for you time!
LGTM label has been added.
/approve Thanks!
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: kaisoz, mbobrovskyi, mimowo
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
A ResourceFlavor name is referenced in different ways through the code, either as a
ResourceFlavorReference
or as astring
. This PR ensures that onlyResourceFlavorReference
is used unless a cast to string is absolutely necessary.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3491
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?