kubernetes-sigs / wg-device-management

Prototypes and experiments for WG Device Management.
Apache License 2.0
7 stars 7 forks source link

dra-evolution: "vendor" vs. "driver developer" #18

Closed pohly closed 4 weeks ago

pohly commented 3 months ago

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/wg-device-management/pull/14 and also KEPs sometimes talk about a "driver vendor". Sometimes "driver developer" is used instead. We should pick one and use it consistently.

Advantage of "vendor": familiar term, matches well with "hardware vendor". Disadvantage: some drivers maintainer by an open source developer or community don't have a vendor.

Disadvantage of "driver developer": that sounds like the person doing the work, which is not appropriate in some places ("Driver name must be a DNS subdomain and should end with a DNS domain owned by the vendor of the driver.").

k8s-triage-robot commented 4 weeks ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

pohly commented 4 weeks ago

I think "vendor" has won in terms of popularity.

/close

k8s-ci-robot commented 4 weeks ago

@pohly: Closing this issue.

In response to [this](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/wg-device-management/issues/18#issuecomment-2326035485): >I think "vendor" has won in terms of popularity. > >/close > Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.