Closed ifeulner closed 7 months ago
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
Unfortunately this is not easily possible through the Hetzner Cloud API right now. Subnets do not have any IDs. You can only assign a Server to a Network, and the last created Subnet will be used, alternatively you can specify the IP yourself (in the API).
I have added 5 Votes (OP + 4 Upvotes) to the matching issue in our internal feedback tracker.
/area provider/hetzner
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
This would still be nice to have for my use case. Are there any updates on providing a subnet ID?
No updates from the API side. There is also no one working on the cluster-autoscaler side of things. We have the same feature request in the terraform provider, so perhaps its something that could be done in hcloud-go
and shared between the integrations. Open for any contributions, here or in hcloud-go
:)
Which component are you using?: Horizontal autoscaler
The hetzner implementation , see https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/tree/master/cluster-autoscaler/cloudprovider/hetzner
What version of the component are you using?: 1.25.0
Component version: 1.25.0 What k8s version are you using (
kubectl version
)?:kubectl version
OutputWhat environment is this in?:
What did you expect to happen?: If a subnet_id will be provided, the right subnet network will be used for assigning an ip when creating the autoscaler node
Autoscaler nodes get an ip out of the range specified in the subnet network What happened instead?:
Node creation fails
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible): Specificy an subnet id in `HCLOUD_NETWORK' instead of a network id
Anything else we need to know?: