Open payxn opened 1 month ago
/area cluster-autoscaler
Your issue seems be similar to this.
It's recommended to use separate node groups per zone.
Actually I don't have any issue (so I don't think that is similar), it works, but weirdly or slowly. Having one one group per AZ works the same.
Which component are you using?: Cluster autoscaler
What version of the component are you using?: Chart version: 9.37.0
Bug description : I'm testing a scale-up of a stateful set where the PVC was already created. It takes some time (more time than a normal scale up) to scale up a node in the same availability zone as the PVC. Is this normal? Additionally, sometimes it scales a node that's not in the same availability zone and then rescales a node after a while (seemingly randomly). Is this also normal?
What did you expect to happen?: Not taking that much time to launch a node with a PVC already created. Also, not launching a node in a different AZ than the POD & PVC.
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible): Just launch a statefulset with a PVC. Then, downscale the sts so cluster-autoscaler will remove the node (because of no activity), then rescale the statefulset.
Anything else we need to know?: My cluster-autoscaler configuration
My node group :