Closed nathanperkins closed 8 months ago
This issue is currently awaiting triage.
If the repository mantainers determine this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted
label and provide further guidance.
The triage/accepted
label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted
in a comment.
@sdmodi it seems we need to have this into account when we bump golang minor versions https://github.com/zshihang/cloud-provider-gcp/commit/0d75b8baf918f8d25c9d0fbe9f4058cda8cc45c8 :/
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
578 failed because of cloud-provider-gcp-verify-crds complaining about changes in the go.sum file. When I ran
update-codegen.sh
locally with go 1.19, no changes were made. When I changed to go 1.20 and re-ranupdate-codegen.sh
, it made the same changes that were requested by the prow job. I've committed and pushed those changes to my PR.It seems that the prow job may be using go 1.20, which generates go.sum differently. In that case, it may be worth updating the
go.mod
to 1.20 as well, so that contributors would not be confused.In any case, my PR didn't originally include any changes to the go.mod or go.sum so it seems like there may be an inconsistency at HEAD.