Closed ramineni closed 2 years ago
/kind bug
@ramineni can you link the bug you mentioned in #1440 to cloud-provider repo when it's ready?so we know whether some way proposed there instead fix by using our own version number.. thanks
/triage accepted
@ialidzhikov: The label triage/accepted
cannot be applied. Only GitHub organization members can add the label.
/assign
raised issue in cloudprovider repo for the same , https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider/issues/49
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
Would it be worth peeking at how they did it for the AWS provider — would it work for us here too?
looks like the problem can be solved by using there example
the only question I am having is following
# ./openstack-cloud-controller-manager-amd64 --version
Kubernetes v1.17.0-426-g033052e-dirty
on master branch
# git describe
v1.17.0-427-g11155c9
# git checkout v1.23.1
Note: checking out 'v1.23.1'.
# git describe
v1.23.0-4-g1b5899e
so git describe
looks like search for latest tag it can reach at the current branch, we are using 1.17 now
so I guess everytime we do a release is create a release branch then tag on that branch
thus master branch can only reach 1.17 ?
if we accept this, then I can submit a PR for this @ramineni @lingxiankong @MPV
so I guess everytime we do a release is create a release branch then tag on that branch
Yeah, we should change this.
I think this method could be good workaround for now.
Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST?: occm version not displayed correctly on using refactored cloudprovider code from k/k 1.21 release
What happened:
What you expected to happen:
How to reproduce it:
Anything else we need to know?:
Environment: