kubernetes / cloud-provider-openstack

Apache License 2.0
599 stars 597 forks source link

[occm] KEP-1860: Add support for LoadBalancer ipMode #2587

Closed kbudde closed 1 month ago

kbudde commented 2 months ago

What this PR does / why we need it: This PR adds support for ipMode in LoadBalancer status field introduced in KEP-1860. This enables the usage of Proxy Protocol without workaround (EnableIngressHostname + IngressHostnameSuffix).

The workarounds were introducing new issues, e.g. externalDNS was not functional with a loadbalancer with ingress Hostname set.

Which issue this PR fixes(if applicable): There is no open issue as a workaround was introduced.

Special notes for reviewers: Tthe ipMode field is available even if IpMode is still behind a featureGate, so this change could be backported to 1.29.

Release note:

[occm] KEP-1860: Add support for LoadBalancer ipMode
linux-foundation-easycla[bot] commented 2 months ago

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

k8s-ci-robot commented 2 months ago

Welcome @kbudde!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. :smiley:

k8s-ci-robot commented 2 months ago

Hi @kbudde. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
dulek commented 2 months ago

@gryf, you might want to check this out.

jichenjc commented 2 months ago

/ok-to-test

k8s-ci-robot commented 2 months ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zetaab

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[pkg/openstack/OWNERS](https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/blob/master/pkg/openstack/OWNERS)~~ [zetaab] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment
zetaab commented 2 months ago

we are soonish releasing 1.30 (https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/pull/2584) but IMO this could be interesting feature to new release.

cc @dulek @jichenjc

jichenjc commented 2 months ago

/lgtm /hold

@dulek maybe you can check this again before merge

dulek commented 2 months ago

I added a bunch of questions.

dulek commented 1 month ago

/hold cancel