Closed kbudde closed 1 month ago
Welcome @kbudde!
It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.
You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.
You can also check if kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack has its own contribution guidelines.
You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.
If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!
Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. :smiley:
Hi @kbudde. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test
on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.
Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test
label.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
@gryf, you might want to check this out.
/ok-to-test
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: zetaab
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
we are soonish releasing 1.30 (https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/pull/2584) but IMO this could be interesting feature to new release.
cc @dulek @jichenjc
/lgtm /hold
@dulek maybe you can check this again before merge
I added a bunch of questions.
/hold cancel
What this PR does / why we need it: This PR adds support for ipMode in LoadBalancer status field introduced in KEP-1860. This enables the usage of Proxy Protocol without workaround (EnableIngressHostname + IngressHostnameSuffix).
The workarounds were introducing new issues, e.g. externalDNS was not functional with a loadbalancer with ingress Hostname set.
Which issue this PR fixes(if applicable): There is no open issue as a workaround was introduced.
Special notes for reviewers: Tthe ipMode field is available even if IpMode is still behind a featureGate, so this change could be backported to 1.29.
Release note: