Closed parispittman closed 1 year ago
@parispittman: The label(s) sig/experience
cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.
lol dang that hyphen
/sig contributor-experience
/area community-management
@Debanitrkl: The label(s) priority/long-term
cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.
/priority important-longterm
Strong +1 here.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 19:09 Paris @.***> wrote:
we have several platforms (mailing list, slack, etc) that are all moderated and/or administered in some way with a different set of moderators (some that overlap) for each. between sig-contribex chairs, myself, and other active leads on certain platforms, we all play a part in what could be a carved out role for a moderation lead.
this person would help with:
- training and onboarding all new members
- communicating changes to any of the flow (tech or non tech)
- helping to formulate incident management reporting
- check-ins with moderators
- recruiting new moderators
- updating documentation
- what else?
this person should:
- have experience moderating at least one of the platforms for kubernetes, current or in the past
- what else?
this issue will close when/if:
- we've drafted the role and its merged by one of the contribex leads
- we can't come to an agreement that the role should exist
/sig-contributor experience
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kubernetes/community/issues/6088, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKUD6J4S5JSFE43QLK5A7LUEOMDXANCNFSM5FA7TVJQ .
--
Chris Short https://linktr.ee/TheChrisShort He/Him/His TZ=America/Detroit
Big +1 - and I would suggest a person + shadow(s) for this. It might also be good to have a calendar/schedule so there's continual coverage.
I am interested in this role. Having served as Slack, email, and YouTube moderator, I have knowledge and am also looking to get back in to contributing.
I was going to say: I don't see the point in having such a role unless we have a candidate for it. But: if Marky is available, I'll happily +1 him.
Couple of bits of feedback, neither of which should be considered blockers, just so that we get the role description right:
I agree that this role would require more than 5 hours per week. 10 - 15 is more what I feel is needed, and I am up for that. As for gathering info from other moderators, this is an excellent idea. I do feel this could be done in parallel with the building of the role.
folks: #6278 your reviews would be very appreciated. thank you!
Also ... should this Lead be responsible for reporting to the CoCC?
@jberkus yes, I see that as being critical
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
This is still ongoing but very close to the end.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
I think this is complete @parispittman also cc @coderanger
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
This has been completed /close
@markyjackson-taulia: Closing this issue.
we have several platforms (mailing list, slack, etc) that are all moderated and/or administered in some way with a different set of moderators (some that overlap) for each. between sig-contribex chairs, myself, and other active leads on certain platforms, we all play a part in what could be a carved out role for a moderation lead.
this person would help with:
this person should:
this issue will close when/if:
/sig-contributor experience