blog: meet our contributors APAC China region

[jayesh-srivastava]

This PR adds the third blog post for China region, in the series of "Meet Our Contributors - APAC" blog series.

Reference issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/issues/4469#issuecomment-942422348

[jberkus]

Also ... are you sure you want to publish this on 6/11, a Saturday?

[jayesh-srivastava]

Also ... are you sure you want to publish this on 6/11, a Saturday?

Didn't think about this. Will change this to the 13th of June.

[jayesh-srivastava]

@jberkus Can you review this now please?

[jberkus]

Jayesh,

There's still some of the issues I called out in my first review.

[sftim]

If we want this mirrored onto https://k8s.io/blog/ (which is usual), please open a PR there once the final contents are agreed.

I suggest delaying a day or two to get that sorted. We can /hold this merge, get approvals, and then unhold it on publication day (cf https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/issues/281)

[jayesh-srivastava]

/hold

[jayesh-srivastava]

I suggest delaying a day or two to get that sorted. We can /hold this merge, get approvals, and then unhold it on publication day (cf https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/issues/281)

@sftim I have updated the date too.

[jayesh-srivastava]

@sftim @jberkus Are there more changes to be made? The date has to be changed tho.

[jberkus]

Jayesh:

There's still to blocks of text that need correction, per above.

[jayesh-srivastava]

@jberkus Have made the changes.

[jayesh-srivastava]

/remove-hold

[jayesh-srivastava]

@jberkus @sftim I guess this can be merged now. I changed the publish date to today's only. Also the hold label needs to be removed. I am not able to do it.

[Debanitrkl]

/remove-hold

[jberkus]

@Debanitrkl @kaslin @sftim we need a date for this, since it'll go on the Kubernetes blog as well.

[Debanitrkl]

I guess next Monday i.e on 11th July let's schedule it.

[jayesh-srivastava]

@Debanitrkl @kaslin @sftim @jberkus Have we decided on the date? Should I change it in the blog?

[sftim]

11th would be fine by me. Is there a PR against https://github.com/kubernetes/website already?

/hold We can remove the hold on the publication date.

[jayesh-srivastava]

@sftim No there isn't a PR for k/website. I'll make it now as we have decided on the date. Also, I've updated the date for this PR.

[jayesh-srivastava]

@sftim This is the PR against k/website. (https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/34865)

[jayesh-srivastava]

@sftim @Debanitrkl @jberkus Since there are more reviews on the PR against the k/website which haven't been finalized yet, I think we can hold this PR too until the 18th which is a Monday.

[sftim]

@jayesh-srivastava I'm a reviewer for both blogs; I'm fine with the idea of taking the text from here as the final version. It's nice to incorporate any feedback from SIG Docs' blog team, but not essential.

[jayesh-srivastava]

@sftim I've updated this article as well as the mirror (https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/34865) to get published on August 15th. Can you please review them?

[sftim]

/label tide/merge-method-squash /hold until publication date - see https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/issues/281

/lgtm /approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Debanitrkl, jayesh-srivastava, sftim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/blob/master/OWNERS)~~ [sftim] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

[sftim]

/hold cancel

Ready to publish