Bump Hugo version to 0.112

[sftim]

Bump Hugo version to ~0.110~ 0.112 (preview).

There is build-time warning:

.Path when the page is backed by a file is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. We plan to use Path for a canonical source path and you probably want to check the source is a file. To get the current behaviour, you can use a construct similar to the one below:

  {{ $path := "" }}
  {{ with .File }}
    {{ $path = .Path }}
  {{ else }}
    {{ $path = .Path }}
  {{ end }}

Also, update local preview using a container image (copy approach from k/website Makefile). The container image now mounts this Git repo read-only.

Helps with https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/issues/360

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sftim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/blob/master/OWNERS)~~ [sftim] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

[mrbobbytables]

/hold This does break the site a bit - take a look at the side menu on the preview vs the actual site: https://deploy-preview-374--kubernetes-contributor.netlify.app/docs/ https://kubernetes.dev/docs/

[jberkus]

@sftim so the issue is the preview rather than the Hugo version?

[sftim]

I think there is a real problem here; it's harder to see what that is because my local preview is - right now - missing the generated content either way.

We shouldn't merge this change as-is.

PR https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/pull/375 may help us to find a newer Hugo version that nonetheless works OK, and that find may then help us spot what to change so that we can upgrade further.

[sftim]

We can work around the Hugo problem by setting GOMAXPROCS to 1

[sftim]

I think this is good to unhold - check the site, it looks right with the latest fixes.

We can remove those once a separate PR updates Docsy.

[cblecker]

This seems fine. Clicked around the preview a bunch and it looks good.

/lgtm

[sftim]

Thanks

/hold cancel

[fsmunoz]

FWIW I've compared things side-by-side and didn't find any different, looks good.