Open SidakM-zz opened 5 years ago
Hello @shalini-b @SidakM-zz @janetkuo 👋
I'm checking in once again, as we approach the 1.24 enhancements freeze next week, on Thursday, February 3rd, 2022 at 18:00 PM PT
.
Currently the status of the enhancement is at risk
.
Looks like, for this enhancement to be tracked into the 1.24 release, it would require updating the following open KEP PR to add a PRR review file, and getting it merged before the enhancements freeze.
Also please update the issue description with appropriate stages & links (it helps with release team's tracking progress). Thank you so much once again! 🙂
The Enhancements Freeze is now in effect and this enhancement is removed from the release. Please feel free to file an exception.
/milestone clear
pushed once again ? no one has the time to code it? or no one thinks its important enough? :( It REALLY beats having to do a delete with no cascade (to keep pods and pvcs) and then re-creating the statefulset - hoping it reconnects with existing pods and pvcs :).
Any news?
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
Any news? (this is a 4 years old issue 😐😖)
@R-Studio time for someone interested in this to step up and do the work.
https://twitter.com/dims/status/1593348306054397952?s=20&t=PuhfxZlKxw1B-V-QJFsbIg
@dims I would really like to but unfortunately i am not a developer or have enough experience with kubernetes in general (I have only been working with kubernetes for 6 months). Maybe I can help in years 😅
@R-Studio time for someone interested in this to step up and do the work.
https://twitter.com/dims/status/1593348306054397952?s=20&t=PuhfxZlKxw1B-V-QJFsbIg
Actually a KEP already exists: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/2842
@dims I would really love to help take this one further it that is all right. How do I go about it ? Do I open a new PR inheriting what is in https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/2842 and addressing the comments from it ?
@harshanarayana i'd recommend talking to the sig-storage leadership - https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-storage#leadership
try async first (email sig-storage mailing list and slack) as you are in IST. you may have to get on their agenda/calendar (sig storage meeting) if that does not work.
This enhancement issue has actually been in our tracking spreadsheet which we go over in every SIG Storage meeting. It has not got an update for while but design discussions just started again on the KEP: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/3412
@xing-yang This is now being actively discussed with the help of @gnufied and @jsafrane . @areller and I are working together on the KEP. Thanks
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle frozen
@harshanarayana any news on this?
Yeah - this would really be nice to support - it makes production harder than it needs to be - having to delete and recreate statefulsets - ensuring pods aren't killed with cascade=false
It's going to be really helpful
I got side tracked with a few other work and same seem to be the case with @areller . But let me get back to that old Document and put up an updated one for discussion again.
We have created #4650 , and working on it at #4651 . The new KEP allows arbitrary changes to the volumeClaimTemplates
, it should cover the use-case of this KEP, and more.
@huww98 does this means you're replacing #661 and we should close the other?
Enhancement Description
Please to keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team track efficiently the evolution of the enhancement